Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
956-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

956-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022008 50.876446)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.021965 50.876442,-1.021967 50.876450,-1.021973 50.876458,-1.021982 50.876464,-1.021994 50.876468,-1.022007 50.876469,-1.022020 50.876468,-1.022032 50.876464,-1.022042 50.876458,-1.022048 50.876451,-1.022050 50.876443,-1.022048 50.876434,-1.022042 50.876427,-1.022033 50.876421,-1.022021 50.876417,-1.022008 50.876415,-1.021983 50.876420,-1.021973 50.876426,-1.021967 50.876434,-1.021965 50.876442)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL